EDMONDSON v. EDMONDSON

7 Div. 755.

200 So.2d 652 (1967)

Naomi EDMONDSON v. Hugh EDMONDSON.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 22, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Loma B. Beaty, Fort Payne, for appellant.

Beck & Beck, Fort Payne, for appellee.


SIMPSON, Justice.

This appeal must be dismissed for the following reason: The appellant's brief fails totally to comply with Rule 8(9) of this court which became effective on April 1, 1965.

Under that rule this court, for the expeditious handling of its business, prescribed rules governing the forms and lengths of brief. In no particular does the appellant's brief comply. For example, it is on legal size paper; it is not bound on the side, but at the top;...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases