1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 273 F.Supp.
  5. 273 F.Supp. 573 (1967)
 

TELEFLEX INCORPORATED v. AMERICAN CHAIN & CABLE CO.

Nos. 64 Civ. 1944, 2139.

273 F.Supp. 573 (1967)

TELEFLEX INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN CHAIN & CABLE COMPANY, Inc., Defendant. The MORSE INSTRUMENT CO., Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN CHAIN & CABLE COMPANY, Inc., Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

January 11, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William K. Kerr, of Fish, Richardson & Neave, New York City, for plaintff Teleflex Inc.; John O. Tramontine, Gerald J. Flintoft, New York City, Richard P. Barnard, Birmingham, Mich., of counsel.

Brumbaugh, Free, Graves & Donohue, New York City, for plaintiff Morse Instrument Co.; Everett R. Hamilton, Jack L. Renner, Akron, Ohio, of counsel.

Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Taylor & Adams, New York City, for defendant; Willis H. Taylor, Jr., Charles J. Brown, Peter W. Krehbiel, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

McLEAN, District Judge.

In June 1964 plaintiff Teleflex Incorporated (Teleflex) brought an action for a declaratory judgment determining that Patent No. 3,015,969 issued on January 9, 1962 to Otto J. Bratz and assigned by him to his employer, defendant American Chain & Cable Company, Inc. (ACCO), is invalid and that products manufactured and sold by Teleflex do not infringe the patent. The complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases