HARTMAN v. HOLLINGSWORTH

Docket No. 31033.

255 Cal.App.2d 579 (1967)

63 Cal. Rptr. 563

CHESTER R. HARTMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. MARY B. HOLLINGSWORTH, as Executrix, et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

November 1, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Lisle Schechter and Margaret Keller for Defendants and Appellants.

Holt, Holt & Long and Leighton G. Long for Plaintiffs and Respondents.


LILLIE, J.

This is an appeal from part of a judgment in a mandamus proceeding which orders the various respondents below to allow petitioner Robert E. Hartman, as a director of a corporation at the time of its dissolution, to inspect the corporate books and records in their possession. A similar right was denied the remaining petitioner, Chester R. Hartman, it being found that he was not a director at the time in question.

In issue is the construction to be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases