1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 156 S.E.2d
  5. 156 S.E.2d 673 (1967)
 

YORK v. YORK

No. 120.

156 S.E.2d 673 (1967)

271 N.C. 416

Arthur Lee YORK, Oliver Lee York and wife, Margaret York, Petitioners, v. Floyd C. YORK and wife, Betty York, Respondents, v. C. W. RANDOLPH and wife, Lockie Randolph, Additional Parties.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 20, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce J. Brown, Asheville, for respondent appellants, Floyd C. York and wife, Betty York.

Don C. Young, Asheville, for Arthur Lee York, Oliver Lee York and wife, Margaret York, petitioner appellees.

Cecil C. Jackson, Jr., Asheville, for C. W. Randolph and wife, Lockie Randolph, additional parties, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The respondents attacked the validity of the sale of the lands for three reasons: first, that they received no notice of the pendency of the action or the sale of the lands; second, that the alleged certificate of Mrs. Turnbull was not in the files, and the orders of the clerk and the judge adding them and correcting the record was error; and, third, that notice of the proceedings was not mailed by the clerk as required by G.S. § 1-99.2, and specifically...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases