1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 35 Wis.2d
  5. 35 Wis.2d 790 (1967)
 

PETERMAN v. STATE,

35 Wis.2d 790 (1967)

PETERMAN, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 30, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief and oral argument by James E. Shapiro of Milwaukee.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Robert E. Sutton, assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and Hugh R. O'Connell, district attorney.

HANSEN, J.

The issue before this court is: Under all of the circumstances in this particular case, was the statement of the defendant properly admitted into evidence at the trial?

The defendant's attorney made no objection in the trial court to the admission of the statement which is now challenged on appeal. This court stated in Holloway v. State (1966), 32 Wis.2d 559

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases