1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 245 Or.
  5. 245 Or. 574 (1967)
 

BAUMAN v. BAUMAN

245 Or. 574 (1967)

423 P.2d 181

BAUMAN v. BAUMAN

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed February 1, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Rhoten, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Rhoten, Rhoten & Speerstra and George Rossman, Salem.

Orval N. Thompson, Albany, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Weatherford, Thompson, Horton & Jordan, Albany.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, O'CONNELL, DENECKE and REDDING, Justices.

REVERSED.

DENECKE, J.

This appeal concerns the interpretation of a tax provision in a property settlement agreement. The question was litigated upon an order requiring the defendant husband to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failure to pay certain taxes plaintiff wife contends are to be paid by him pursuant to a decree which incorporated the property settlement agreement. The court held the agreement did not require the payment of such...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases