The issue on this appeal is whether or not the record contains substantial evidence to support the finding that the appellant was the claimant's employer from May, 1962 to April, 1963. The board determined that Richards, the franchise dealer, was not an independent contractor, but an employee of the employer-appellant, and that the claimant, hired to assist him, was also its employee. (See Labor Law, § 560, subd. 2.) The evidence sustains...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
