1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 264 F.Supp.
  5. 264 F.Supp. 550 (1967)
 

FREEDMAN v. ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 66-1056.

264 F.Supp. 550 (1967)

Leah FREEDMAN and Milton Freedman, her husband, Plaintiffs, v. ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

February 14, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Reich, Gerald N. Ziskind, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Joseph B. Bagley, of Bagley & Sydor, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MARSH, District Judge.

The complaint for declaratory relief does not show the citizenship of the plaintiffs nor the citizenship of the defendant insurance company.1 Thus, on its face, the complaint does not show diversity jurisdiction. The conclusion that diversity exists is insufficient. However, for the purpose of this opinion, we assume that the plaintiffs can amend to show facts which establish jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases