ROTHLEIN v. ARMOUR AND COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 66-362.

268 F.Supp. 545 (1967)

Regis ROTHLEIN, Robert Rectenwald, Anthony J. Zoelle, Robert McLaughlin, Robert Safron and Leo Heckman, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ARMOUR AND COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

June 9, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McArdle & McLaughlin, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiffs.

John G. Wayman, Scott F. Zimmerman, Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.


OPINION

WEBER, District Judge.

This case involves a claim by certain employees against their employer to enforce claims arising out of their collective bargaining agreement, under the provisions of Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 185. Originally, plaintiffs had not availed themselves of the grievance procedure in their contract, and on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, the court ordered all proceedings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases