1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 247 Or.
  5. 247 Or. 566 (1967)
 

PADEL v. NARITS

247 Or. 566 (1967)

430 P.2d 1002

PADEL, Appellant, v. NARITS, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed September 7, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest W. Kissling, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Rask, Hefferin & Bowerman.

Frederic P. Roehr, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Vergeer, Samuels, Cavanaugh & Roehr.

Before PERRY, Chief Justice, and SLOAN, GOODWIN, DENECKE and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

LUSK, J.

Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment for defendant based on a jury verdict in a personal injury action growing out of a collision between automobiles in a street intersection in Portland.

The accident occurred in the intersection of East Burnside Street (hereinafter Burnside) and Southeast 32d Avenue (hereinafter 32d) in the City of Portland. Burnside at the time of the accident was a four-lane highway west of 32d. To the east...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases