1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 270 F.Supp.
  5. 270 F.Supp. 533 (1967)
 

BALTIMORE AIRCOIL CO. v. YORK DIVISION, BORG-WARNER CORP.

Civ. A. No. 9235.

270 F.Supp. 533 (1967)

BALTIMORE AIRCOIL COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff, v. YORK DIVISION, BORG-WARNER CORPORATION and York Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court M. D. Pennsylvania.

June 30, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Heath L. Allen, Metzger, Hafer, Keefer, Thomas & Wood, Harrisburg, Pa., Davidson C. Miller, Stevens, Davis, Miller & Mosher, Washington, D. C., Rufus S. Day, Jr., McAfee, Hanning, Newcomer, Hazlett & Wheeler, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Donn I. Cohen, York, Pa., Joseph W. Swain, Jr., Bruce B. Wilson, Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, Virgil E. Woodcock, Charles F. Duffield, Woodcock, Phelan & Washburn, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM

FOLLMER, District Judge.

Defendants have filed two motions to strike certain of plaintiff's answers to defendants' requests for admissions.1 It is claimed that the said answers are either sham, not responsive or equivocal.

Plaintiff contends that the motion to strike is improper. It appears that the courts are not unanimous as to the propriety of a motion to strike an answer to a request for admission. In 35B...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases