1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 272 F.Supp.
  5. 272 F.Supp. 523 (1967)
 

SCHENIN v. MICRO COPPER CORP.

No. 66 Civ. 4466.

272 F.Supp. 523 (1967)

Jack SCHENIN d/b/a I. J. Schenin Company, Plaintiff, v. MICRO COPPER CORP., Vanura Uranium, Inc., William T. Swift and E. R. Cook, Jr., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

July 12, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward Nathan, New York City, for plaintiff, Edward Nathan, Matthew Anenberg, New York City, of counsel.

Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, for defendants, Micro Copper Corp., William T. Swift and E. R. Cook, Jr., Robert D. Krumme, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

HERLANDS, District Judge:

Defendants Swift, Cook and Micro Copper Corporation [hereinafter "Micro"] have moved for an order:

"(a) Pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing the complaint on the ground that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the person, and (b) Pursuant to Rules 12(b) and 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure granting judgment to William T. Swift and E. R. Cook, Jr. on the ground...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases