1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.2d
  4. 66 Cal.2d
  5. 66 Cal.2d 728 (1967)
 

ENYEART v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

Docket No. L.A. 29306.

66 Cal.2d 728 (1967)

427 P.2d 509

58 Cal. Rptr. 733

BUEL F. ENYEART et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

May 25, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rutan & Tucker, Homer L. McCormick, Jr., and James E. Erickson for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

James R. Christiansen, City Attorney (Carpinteria), and Donald Olson, City Attorney (Culver City), as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Adrian Kuyper, County Counsel, and Ronald Steelman, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents.

Harold W. Kennedy, County Counsel (Los Angeles), Gordon W. Treharne, Deputy County Counsel, McCutchen, Black, Verleger & Shea, Philip K. Verleger and Harry C. Harper as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.

BURKE, J.

This mandamus proceeding presents the question of whether respondent Board of Supervisors of Orange County correctly determined that written protests against the proposed incorporation of a new city represented 51 percent of properly includible assessed valuation and so required termination of the incorporation proceeding as provided by section 34311 of the Government Code.1 We have concluded

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases