1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 155 Conn.
  5. 155 Conn. 636 (1967)
 

ROSENBERG v. PLANNING BOARD

155 Conn. 636 (1967)

CHARLES H. ROSENBERG ET AL. v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF STAMFORD ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided December 19, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julius B. Kuriansky, with whom was Gordon R. Paterson, for the appellant-appellee (defendant Benenson).

Theodore Godlin, assistant corporation counsel, with whom, on the brief, was W. Patrick Ryan, corporation counsel, for the appellant-appellee (named defendant).

Isadore M. Mackler, for the appellees-appellants (plaintiffs).

ALCORN, HOUSE, THIM, RYAN and COVELLO, JS.

THIM, J.

The defendant Edward H. Benenson owns approximately thirty-five acres of unimproved land in Stamford on which he desires to construct office and laboratory buildings. Benenson's land is presently designated in the city's master plan as "Residential Single Family Plots Less Than One Acre." It is also zoned for that use on the city's zoning map. A change in the zone classification is necessary before the land can be put to the contemplated use. The Stamford...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases