1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 35 Wis.2d
  5. 35 Wis.2d 741 (1967)
 

ESTATE OF JAVORNIK

35 Wis.2d 741 (1967)

ESTATE OF JAVORNIK: STATE, Appellant, v. VODNIK and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 30, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant the cause was argued by Roy G. Mita, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

For the respondent Helen Gertrude Vodnik there was a brief and oral argument by Richard J. Steinberg of Milwaukee.

HALLOWS, J.

The state contends the trial court abused its discretion in reopening the case for additional testimony because the grounds for such a request did not comply with the requirements for granting a new trial. The state views the rehearing as a new trial but it is clear from the record that the second hearing was a continuation of the first hearing because only additional proof was adduced and there was no resubmission of evidence. A new trial may be granted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases