1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 387 F.2d
  5. 387 F.2d 380 (1967)
 

WINKLER v. PRINGLE

Nos. 16757-16759.

387 F.2d 380 (1967)

Edmund WINKLER, Appellant, v. Samuel W. PRINGLE and The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Appellees. Edmund WINKLER, Appellee, v. Samuel W. PRINGLE and The Pennsylvania Railroad Company The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided December 20, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edmund Winkler, pro se.

Norman J. Cowie, Pringle, Bredin, Thomson, Rhodes & Grigsby, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants in No. 16758 and appellees in Nos. 16757 and 16759 (Pringle and Penna. Railroad Co.).

Before HASTIE, FREEDMAN and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge.

These three appeals resulted from the filing on March 6, 1967, by appellant in Nos. 16757 and 16759 (hereinafter called petitioner) of a Petition for Renewal and Reopening of Proceedings instituted in the District Court in 1962 (a civil rights action filed as C.A. 62-808, W.D.Pa.), which had been finally determined by dismissal in 1964. See Winkler v. Pringle, 214 F.Supp. 125

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases