The action is remitted to the trial court for a hearing and a determination, with specific findings, as to whether the Judge to whom the application for an eavesdropping order was made had reasonable grounds to issue it. In the interim, the appeals will be held in abeyance. The procedure prescribed in People v. Mullgrav (
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.