1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 247 Or.
  5. 247 Or. 503 (1967)
 

IN RE LITTLE AND KING

247 Or. 503 (1967)

431 P.2d 284

IN RE COMPLAINT AS TO THE CONDUCT OF CARL M. LITTLE AND STEPHEN M. KING, ACCUSED.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

September 7, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gunther F. Krause, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for Carl M. Little, Accused.

William M. Dale and Thomas H. Tongue, Portland, argued the cause and filed briefs for Stephen M. King, Accused.

John J. Higgins, Portland, argued the cause for Oregon State Bar. With him on the brief was Stuart W. Gates.

Before PERRY, Chief Justice, and McALLISTER, SLOAN, GOODWIN, LUSK and FORT, Justices.

Little suspended for one year, King publicly reprimanded September 7, 1967.

PETITIONER LITTLE SUSPENDED FOR ONE YEAR.

PETITIONER KING PUBLICLY REPRIMANDED.

PER CURIAM

This is a review of the recommendation of the Board of Governors of the Oregon State Bar in a disciplinary proceeding brought against two members of the Bar, Carl M. Little and Stephen M. King.

The proceeding was commenced by a complaint served on the accused in March...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases