1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 381 F.2d
  5. 381 F.2d 365 (1967)
 

BOSTON AND MAINE CORP. v. CHICAGO, B. & Q. R. CO.

No. 422, Docket 31033.

381 F.2d 365 (1967)

BOSTON AND MAINE CORPORATION, Appellee, v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided July 25, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl E. Newton, Robert S. Ogden, Jr., Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, New York City, for appellee.

Donald L. Wallace, C. Barry Schaefer, Clark, Carr & Ellis, New York City, for appellant.

Before WATERMAN, FRIENDLY and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal seeks reversal of the disposition of this litigation by Judge Wyatt of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a disposition upon appellee's motion for summary judgment1 adequately explained as to the merits of the controversy in Judge Wyatt's excellent opinion reported at 258 F.Supp. 930 (1966). We affirm the judgment below and do so substantially...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases