PERRY v. TAX COMMISSION


245 Or. 483 (1967)

422 P.2d 578

PERRY ET AL v. STATE TAX COMMISSION and CITY OF PORTLAND and PORTLAND CENTER DEVELOPMENT CO.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed January 18, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles S. Evans, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, Portland.

Ira W. Jones, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents Hoefke et al. Oliver I. Norville, Portland, argued for taxpayer-respondent, and Maurice O. Georges, Portland, argued for intervenor-respondent. With them on the brief were Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, Salem, for respondents Hoefke et al, and King, Miller, Anderson, Nash & Yerke, and Harvey C. Barragar, Portland, for intervenor-respondent.

Before McALLISTER, Presiding Justice, and SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE, HOLMAN and LUSK, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the Multnomah county Assessor and the Tax Collector, from a decree of the Oregon Tax Court holding that certain real property in the South Auditorium Urban Renewal project in Portland was not subject to taxation in the 1963-64 tax year.

The City of Portland, acting through its urban renewal agency, the Portland Development Commission, undertook the South Auditorium Urban Renewal project. In 1958 a redevelopment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases