No questions of fact have been considered. In our opinion, the refusal of respondents to permit petitioner to examine the standard against which her performance was measured was unreasonable and substantially impaired her right of appeal. The results of the examination should be so stated that the applicant can "check up the conclusions by some objective comparison" (Matter of Andresen v. Rice, 277 N.Y. 271, 282). In Matter of Gassner v. Board of Examiners of City...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
