BENSON v. ELEVEN-TWENTY ST. CHARLES COMPANY

No. 52352.

422 S.W.2d 297 (1967)

George BENSON et al., Appellants, v. ELEVEN-TWENTY ST. CHARLES COMPANY et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 2.

Motion for Rehearing or to Transfer Denied January 8, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Blumenfeld, Kalishman, Marx & Tureen, Richard Marx, Shifrin, Treiman, Schermer & Susman, Louis B. Susman, St. Louis, for plaintiffs-appellants.

R. H. McRoberts, R. H. McRoberts, Jr., St. Louis, for defendant-respondent, Eleven-Twenty St. Charles Co.

Morris J. Levin, St. Louis, for defendants-respondents, M. H. Mandel and Burton Mandel, Bryan, Cave, McPheeters & McRoberts, Levin & Weinhaus, St. Louis, of counsel.


Motion for Rehearing or to Transfer to Court En Banc Denied January 8, 1968.

BARRETT, Commissioner.

The individual parties, the Gitts and Bensons as plaintiffs and M. H. Mandel as defendant, are the owners of all the common stock of the corporate defendant Eleven-Twenty St. Charles Company. In this multiple-purpose action the Gitts and Bensons sought to have declared void the election of Mandel and his son, Burton, as directors of the corporate defendant;...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases