INTERNAT. BROTHERHOOD v. NEWMAN

43071, 43072.

116 Ga. App. 590 (1967)

158 S.E.2d 298

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS etc. v. NEWMAN et al. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS etc., LOCAL NO. 26 v. NEWMAN et al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided November 6, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank O. Downing, James Edward McAleer, for appellants.

Robert J. Duffy, Emery L. Duffy, for appellees.


HALL, Judge.

In order for evidence presented on a motion to demand that a summary judgment be granted, it must establish that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The burden is upon the moving party, and the party opposing the motion is given the benefit of all reasonable doubts and all favorable inferences that may be drawn from the evidence. Holland v. Sanfax Corp.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases