Claimant was employed in Port Chester, New York. Claimant's husband moved to California on advice of his physician because of a rheumatic fever condition. Claimant went to California with her husband where he found employment. There was no proof submitted that claimant's presence was required in California in the interest of the health or treatment of her husband. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the board's determination...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
