1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 264 F.Supp.
  5. 264 F.Supp. 439 (1967)
 

UNITED STATES v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION

Civ. No. 40529.

264 F.Supp. 439 (1967)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court N. D. California.

February 17, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lyle L. Jones, James J. Coyle, Mary P. Clark, Albert P. Lindemann, Jr., L. David Cole, James E. Figenshaw, Antitrust Div., Dept. of Justice, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.

Stuart S. Ball, H. Blair White, George A. Platz, Chicago, Ill., Robert D. Raven, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DIRECTING DIVESTITURE.

ZIRPOLI, District Judge.

On February 15, 1962, the United States brought this action under the provisions of Section 15 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 25), charging that the acquisition by Kimberly-Clark Corporation (K-C) of the assets and business of Blake, Moffitt & Towne (BMT)1 violated Section 7 of the Clayton Act,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases