LIDSKY v. BRAGARNICK


53 Misc.2d 649 (1967)

David Lidsky et al., Respondents, v. Robert Bragarnick, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

March 30, 1967


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Szold & Schapiro (Martin Szold of counsel), for appellant. Max Steinberg for respondents.

Concur — MARKOWITZ, J. P., HOFSTADTER and HECHT, JR., JJ.


Per Curiam.

In this nonpayment summary proceeding, covering decontrolled premises, landlords seek increased rent based on tenant's continued occupancy after his lease expired, in accordance with a notice served. The effect of such notice and continued occupancy thereunder created a new agreement (St. James Apts. v. Finke, 181 N.Y.S. 356; 463 Realty Corp. v. Moloff, 62 N.Y.S.2d 83; Kaufman v. Bartels, 182 Misc. 128). The jury waiver clause in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases