MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
No reason appears for resorting to inference or extrinsic proof to ascertain the supposed intent, asserted by plaintiff, of the relatively simple and unambiguous contract, prepared by plaintiff's assignor's lawyer who was, in fact, his brother. It is clear that all royalties due according to the express terms of the contract have been paid. The question of damages for a possible breach of the agreement in some other particular is not before...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
