PER CURIAM:
Upon the second trial the evidence of the plaintiff was substantially the same as upon the first one. We have already held that it was sufficient to repel the defendant's motion for nonsuit, and to this we adhere.
In addition to the evidence at the previous trial, the plaintiff offered the adverse examination of defendant's driver, Sledge, which was summarized above.
The defendant's evidence tended to show that Mrs. Snell had an unobstructed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
