1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 72 Wn.2d
  5. 72 Wn.2d 624 (1967)
 

CUMMINS v. KING COUNTY

No. 39032.

72 Wn.2d 624 (1967)

434 P.2d 588

JOHN R. CUMMINS et al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

November 30, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles O. Carroll, James E. Kennedy, and J. Hartly Newsum, for appellant.

Short, Cressman & Cable and Douglas R. Hartwich, for respondents.

LAWLESS, J.†

This is a claim by the respondents, John R. Cummins and Florence A. Cummins (hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs), of inverse condemnation asserting violation of Const. art. 1, § 16 (amendment 9). The appellant, King County (hereinafter referred to as defendant), first contends that the dedicatory language and drawing contained in Pelican Park division 4 plat gives the county an easement right upon the plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases