1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 72 Wn.2d
  5. 72 Wn.2d 620 (1967)
 

LIEBHART v. CALAHAN

No. 39025.

72 Wn.2d 620 (1967)

434 P.2d 605

ELMER LIEBHART, Respondent, v. JAMES E. CALAHAN et al., Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

November 30, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hughes & Jeffers, by Joseph L. Hughes, for appellants.

Ries & Kenison, by Darrell E. Ries, for respondent.

HILL, J.

This case presents but one issue: Was there evidence from which the jury could have found wanton misconduct on the part of the defendant, James E. Calahan?

If there was such evidence, there is no basis for any of the contentions made on this appeal from a judgment of $58,020 against the defendants,1 based on a jury verdict in that amount.

The trial court defined wanton...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases