1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 34 Wis.2d
  5. 34 Wis.2d 653 (1967)
 

SPOEHR v. MITTELSTADT

34 Wis.2d 653 (1967)

SPOEHR, Respondent, v. MITTELSTADT, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 9, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Ross, Stevens, Pick Spohn, attorneys, and Frank A. Ross and Jack F. Olson of counsel, all of Madison, and oral argument by Frank A. Ross,

For the respondent there was a brief and oral, argument by William L. McCusker of Madison.

BEILFUSS, J.

The issue presented is: Was the alleged defamatory statement:privileged so as to make the appellant immune from a slander action for damages?

For the purpose of the motion for summary judgment, the parties agree that the statement as alleged in the complaint was made by the appellant, Mittelstadt; that the statement is not true; that the statement would not have been proper at the trial of the action; and that the pretrial conference was a judicial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases