MARLIN ELECTRIC CO. v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.


33 Wis.2d 651 (1967)

MARLIN ELECTRIC COMPANY and another, Appellants, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 31, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Wickham, Borgelt, Skogstad & Powell, attorneys, and Edmund W. Powell of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Edmund W. Powell.

For the respondent Industrial Commission the cause was argued by Gordon Samuelsen, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

For the respondent Catherine Moloney there was a brief by Charles J. O'Laughlin and Raymond, Mayer, Jenner & Block, all of Chicago, Illinois, and oral argument by Mr. O'Laughlin.


HANLEY, J.

The following three issues are presented on this appeal:

1. In view of the evidence presented was Raymond T. Moloney an employee of the Marlin Electric Company at the time of the accident?

2. Is there any credible evidence in the record to support the commission's finding that Moloney sustained an injury growing out of and incidental to his employment?

3. In view of the evidence presented, is Aetna Casualty & Surety Company estopped...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases