1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 33 Wis.2d
  5. 33 Wis.2d 648 (1967)
 

HANSEN v. STATE

33 Wis.2d 648 (1967)

HANSEN, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 31, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there were briefs by Schwemer & Schwemer of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Paul E. Schwemer.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Robert E. Sutton, assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and Hugh R. O'Connell, district attorney.

HEFFERNAN, J.

All of the errors that defendant complains about are of record. Therefore, coram nobis is not available to the defendant. We have said:

". . .it is clear the limited scope of the writ encompasses only errors of fact outside the record which are unknown to the trial court and which if known would have prevented the entry of judgment." State v. Kanieski (1966), 30 Wis.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases