MTR. OF CARROLL-RATNER v. CITY MGR.


54 Misc.2d 625 (1967)

In the Matter of Carroll-Ratner Corporation et al., Petitioners, v. City Manager of New Rochelle et al., Respondents, and J. A. Valenti Electric Co., Inc., Intervenor-Respondent.

Supreme Court, Westchester County.

August 24, 1967


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McGovern, Vincent & Connelly for petitioners. Francis S. Claps, Corporation Counsel, for respondents. Gaynor, Freeman, Glick & Pisani for intervenor-respondent.


JOHN H. GALLOWAY, JR., J.

Respondents (hereinafter "the City") move to dismiss that portion of petitioners' reply to their answer designated as "For a Supplement to the Petition", upon the ground that it fails to state — cause of action and is insufficient in law. The intervenor-respondent (hereinafter "Valenti") joins in the motion.

Petitioner sought initially under CPLR article 78, an order in the nature of mandamus awarding a certain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases