1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 246 Or.
  5. 246 Or. 431 (1967)
 

DOUTHITT v. KINMAN

246 Or. 431 (1967)

425 P.2d 747

DOUTHITT, Respondent, v. KINMAN, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed March 29, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald S. Kelley, Roseburg, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Luoma, Kelley & Woodruff, Roseburg.

Randolph Slocum, Roseburg, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Horn, Slocum & Washburn, Roseburg.

Before PERRY, Chief Justice, and McALLISTER, O'CONNELL, DENECKE and REDDING, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

O'CONNELL, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant's motion to modify a divorce decree.

Plaintiff and defendant were divorced on May 1, 1963. At that time their daughter, a minor child, was awarded to plaintiff. On January 31, 1966, defendant filed a motion to modify the decree so as to award the custody of the child to him.

Defendant charges plaintiff with immoral conduct rendering...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases