PER CURIAM.
Defendant contends that the trial judge erred in overruling his motion for nonsuit at the close of all the evidence. Considering the evidence in the light most favorable to the State and giving to the State every reasonable inference and intendment to be drawn therefrom, as we must do on motion for nonsuit, we hold there was plenary evidence to repel defendant's motion for nonsuit. State v. Roux,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.