Plaintiff's Assignment of Error No. 37 is that the court failed (1) "to charge the jury as to the duty of defendant's testate as the owner and operator of a motor vehicle in the maintenance of the tires of the vehicle" and (2) "to apply this legal duty to the evidence offered by the plaintiff in this cause." With reference to this duty, his Honor charged the jury as follows:
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.