Petitioner had failed to purchase a dog license within the ordinary time required by law, whereupon the respondent Justice of the Peace issued a summons against him, but which did not state the purpose of the action as required by subdivision 3 of section 113 of the Agriculture and Markets Law. This summons was not personally served on the petitioner, but was merely left at his residence on March 2, 1966. On the same day petitioner appeared...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
