FIDANCE v. GIORDANO


237 A.2d 393 (1967)

Anthony V. FIDANCE, Jr., Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Matthew J. GIORDANO, Defendant Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

December 20, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Courtney H. Cummings, Jr., of Killoran & Van Brunt, Wilmington, for appellant.

William J. Wier, Jr., of Connolly, Bove & Lodge, Wilmington, for appellee.

WOLCOTT, C. J., and CAREY and HERRMANN, JJ., sitting.


PER CURIAM:

After a careful review of all the evidence, we are of the opinion that the judgment below must be affirmed for the following reasons:

1. There are ambiguities in the written agreement, and the Chancellor was accordingly justified in admitting oral evidence. 2. There was ample evidence to justify the Chancellor's basic ruling that appellant paid $6000 to appellee to purchase a one-half interest in the partnership; that the "leasehold...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases