The State first contends that the trial court erred in finding the highest and best use of property was for development as a commercial plant nursery. Suffice it to say that portions of the claimant's property were actually being used for such business at the time of the appropriation and the record is adequate to sustain the finding that the development of the remainder for such purpose was its highest and best use. We would note that the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
