1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 246 Or.
  5. 246 Or. 367 (1967)
 

DIETZMAN v. RALSTON PURINA CO.

246 Or. 367 (1967)

425 P.2d 163

DIETZMAN ET UX, Appellants, v. RALSTON PURINA COMPANY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed March 22, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R.W. PicKell, Salem, argued the cause and filed briefs for appellants.

George L. Hibbard, Oregon City, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hibbard, Jacobs, Caldwell & Kincart and Paul D. Schultz, Oregon City.

Before PERRY, Chief Justice, and McALLISTER, O'CONNELL, DENECKE and REDDING, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

O'CONNELL, J.

This is an action to recover damages for the conversion of plaintiffs' chickens. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of involuntary nonsuit.

Plaintiffs executed and delivered to defendant a chattel mortgage covering a flock of chickens owned by them. Plaintiffs contend that the chattel mortgage was invalid; that defendant refused to release the mortgage; that as a result plaintiffs were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases