1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 278 F.Supp.
  5. 278 F.Supp. 331 (1967)
 

REYNOLDS v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY

No. 67-Civ. 2083.

278 F.Supp. 331 (1967)

Catherine M. REYNOLDS, an infant, by Alice M. Reynolds, her Guardian ad Litem, and Alice M. Reynolds, Plaintiffs, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, Harold Schaffner and Nicholas A. D'Onofrio, co-partners practicing law as Schaffner and D'Onofrio, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

November 17, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tobias & Vogel, Nanuet, N. Y., for plaintiffs, by Harold S. Vogel, Nanuet, N. Y., of counsel.

Hauptman & Lodato, Brooklyn, N. Y., for defendants, by Julius L. Hauptman, Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel.

MEMORANDUM

CROAKE, District Judge.

These are motions under Rule 56, Fed. R.Civ.P. Plaintiffs, Catherine M. Reynolds and Alice M. Reynolds, seek a judgment declaring that the attorneys now responsible for their defense should be required to interpose counterclaims on their behalf. These attorneys and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (HARTFORD), which retained them, have cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the action.

The present difficulties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases