Per Curiam.
The basic contention presented is that by the failure to appoint counsel during the period that elapsed from the time that defendant was arrested on August 25, 1957 and brought before a Magistrate, on August 26, 1957, when he waived examination, to the time of his arraignment upon indictment in Supreme Court on September 23, 1957, defendant was deprived of his constitutional and statutory rights to the aid of counsel during a critical stage of the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
