GILDAY v. HAUCHWIT


48 N.J. Super. 557 (1967)

ELSIE GILDAY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LUCILLE L. HAUCHWIT, DEFENDANT, AND ALFRED G. HAUCHWIT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND PETER CARLO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, ETC., DEFENDANT.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 20, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. A. Leo Bohl argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. John W. Hand argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Evans, Hand, Evans, Allabough & Amoresano, attorneys; Mr. Brian J. McGrievy on the brief).


PER CURIAM.

The judgment as to the defendant Carlo is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Gaulkin and the matter is remanded to the Passaic County Court with directions to enter judgment in favor of said defendant.

For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For affirmance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases