1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 94 N.J.
  5. 94 N.J. Super. 499 (1967)
 

KELLER v. PASTUCH

94 N.J. Super. 499 (1967)

229 A.2d 264

DOROTHY KELLER AND HENRY KELLER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. MICHAEL PASTUCH AND JOSEPH MURRAY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 21, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John E. Wolf argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Saul G. Schulter, attorney).

Mr. Patrick D. Conaghan argued the cause for respondents (Mr. William J. Murray, attorney for Michael Pastuch; Mr. James F. McGovern, Jr., attorney for Joseph Murray).

Before Judges SULLIVAN, KOLOVSKY and CARTON.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KOLOVSKY, J.A.D.

This action was instituted on November 23, 1964 to recover damages allegedly sustained by plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, as the result of the wife's being injured on April 27, 1964 when an automobile driven by defendant Pastuch, in which she was a passenger, struck the rear of an automobile operated by defendant Murray.

The issue on this appeal, taken by plaintiffs upon leave granted, is whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases