1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 33 Wis.2d
  5. 33 Wis.2d 560 (1967)
 

CEDARBURG LIGHT & W. COMM. v. ALLIS-CHALMERS

33 Wis.2d 560 (1967)

CITY OF CEDARBURG LIGHT & WATER COMMISSION, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ALLIS-CHALMERS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent: NORDBERG MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 31, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Foley, Sammond & Lardner, and oral argument by Steven E. Keane and Gilbert W. Church, all of Milwaukee.

For the plaintiff-respondent there was a brief by Levy & Levy of Cedarburg, and by Kivett & Kasdorf of Milwaukee.

For the defendant-respondent there was a brief by Quarles, Herriott & Clemons, attorneys, and L. C. Hammond, Jr., and John S. Holbrook, Jr., of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Hammond.

GORDON, J.

This appeal involves a jury's findings which have been sustained by the trial court. Upon review in this court we are committed to the rule that the judgment must be upheld if there is any credible evidence which under any reasonable view admits of an inference supporting the verdict. Burlison v. Janssen (1966), 30 Wis.2d 495, 141 N.W.2d 274; Zweifel v. Milwaukee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases