Per Curiam.
The respondent, an attorney admitted to practice in the First Judicial Department on April 2, 1951, is charged with serious professional misconduct, including the withdrawal without authority of funds from an estate account.
The charges, which were alleged, sustained by the Referee and established by the record, include the following: (Charge 1) Respondent grossly neglected an estate proceeding for which he had been retained; he failed to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
