1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 435 P.2d
  5. 435 P.2d 152 (1967)
 

CLINE v. HULLUM

No. 41108.

435 P.2d 152 (1967)

Edward Earl CLINE, Jr., Earline Cline Eilerts, H.W. Eilerts, I.N. Berman and Leonard Seigel, Plaintiffs in Error, v. L.M. HULLUM, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

November 7, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hudson, Hudson, Wheaton, Kyle & Brett, by O.C. Essman, Tulsa, for Edward Earl Cline, Jr., Earline Cline Eilerts and H.W. Eilerts, plaintiffs in error.

Jerald M. Schuman, Tulsa, for I.N. Berman and Leonard Seigel, intervenors.

Gable, Gotwals, Hays, Rubin & Fox, Tulsa, for defendant in error.

BERRY, Justice.

Plaintiffs in error, hereafter referred to by name or collectively as defendants, have appealed from a judgment recovered by plaintiff in an action brought to enforce specific performance of a contract for purchase and sale of real property.

Plaintiff's action was based upon a written contract, executed by defendants on March 8, 1963, under which defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases