1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 265 F.Supp.
  5. 265 F.Supp. 319 (1967)
 

CRUICKSHANK v. BOARD OF MAN. OF N. J. REF., BORDENTOWN, N. J.

Civ. A. No. 247-67.

265 F.Supp. 319 (1967)

James CRUICKSHANK, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF MANAGERS OF the NEW JERSEY REFORMATORY, BORDENTOWN, NEW JERSEY, Defendant.

United States District Court D. New Jersey.

March 17, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Cruickshank, pro se.

No appearance for defendant as of this date.

OPINION

WORTENDYKE, District Judge:

Plaintiff, James Cruickshank, seeks a declaratory judgment in this Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201. Plaintiff moves the Court to determine whether two alleged State procedures violate both the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the Eighth Amendment and the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Briefly stated, the two alleged State procedures...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases