THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,
v.
HARRY LEE DODD, Appellant.
In the Matter of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of HARRY LEE DODD, Petitioner,
v.
B.J. RHAY, as Superintendent of the State Penitentiary, Respondent.
The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 20, 1967.
February 20, 1967.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Hamblen, Gilbert & Brooke (Wm. F. Nielsen, of counsel) (Appointed counsel for appeal), for appellant.
George A. Kain and Matt L. Alexander, for respondent.
Harry Lee Dodd, pro se.
The Attorney General and Earl Lasher, Assistant, for respondent.
The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.
HALE, J.
[1] Perhaps one who prefers confinement in an institution for the criminally insane to imprisonment in a regular penitentiary really is deranged. But the law makes no such assumption and vests in each trial judge a wide discretion in judging the mental competency of every defendant to stand trial or plead guilty. The trial judge may make his determination from many things, including the defendant's appearance, demeanor, conduct, personal and...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.